Skip to main content

Make sense of it all

Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters. We don’t drown you in panic-inducing headlines, and we’re not obsessed with being the first to break the news. We’re focused on being helpful to you.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

The lawsuits blocking Trump’s agenda, explained in 2 charts

The courts are acting as a check on executive power. Will it last?

US-POLITICS-TRUMP-CONGRESS
US-POLITICS-TRUMP-CONGRESS
President Donald Trump shakes hands with US Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett as Trump arrives to address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 4, 2025.
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
Nicole Narea
Nicole Narea covers politics Vox. She first joined Vox in 2019, and her work has also appeared in Politico, Washington Monthly, and the New Republic.

President Donald Trump came into office with plans to enact his agenda at breakneck speed, and to some extent, it’s working. Less than 100 days into his second term, Trump has already issued 99 executive orders — a “shock and awe” approach meant to overwhelm his opposition and signal decisive action to his supporters.

However, the courts have emerged as a key obstacle slowing down the implementation of Trump’s policies. Advocates for the many people suffering from those policies — including immigrants, scientists, government workers, and the other everyday Americans who rely on them — are suing the administration and racking up key wins.

Nearly 140 lawsuits have challenged Trump’s executive actions so far, according to Just Security’s litigation tracker. Many of them have centered on the efforts spearheaded by Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” to slash staffing and spending across the federal government. But they have also focused on Trump’s attacks on undocumented immigrants and on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility policies in government and beyond.

So far, federal courts have already blocked, in part or in whole, many of Trump’s executive actions — at least for now. That includes his ban on transgender military servicemembers, his executive order ending birthright citizenship, his efforts to fire thousands of probationary government employees, his attempts to deport people under an obscure 18th-century law, and more. Some of those blocks could later be lifted or made permanent in ongoing litigation and appeals that could reach the Supreme Court.

It’s not clear to what extent the courts will be able to delay, if not entirely stop, some of Trump’s policies from going into effect.

Notably, blocks on some of Trump’s policies stayed in place through the end of his first term because courts ran out of time to resolve legal challenges to them. Trump’s proposals to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, create work requirements for Medicaid, and put a citizenship status question on the 2020 census never went into effect as a result. But in his second term, his administration has hit the ground running, allowing more time for lawsuits to play out and policies to take effect. He was also able to reshape the judiciary during his first term by appointing conservative judges who might favor his policies.

There is also a question of what this Supreme Court will do. As the ultimate interpreter of the law and the Constitution, the court will play a major role in checking — or abetting — Trump’s power grabs. (My colleague Ian Millhiser breaks down two cases in particular to follow.)

And then there is the concern that Trump will continue to ignore court orders. The US is arguably facing a constitutional crisis after the administration did not abide by a judge’s order to turn around planes transporting accused Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare public rebuke of Trump after the president attacked the judge in the El Salvador case as a “Radical Left Lunatic.”

Trump and his administration are determined to expand the president’s power, even when that means disrupting the Constitution’s system of checks and balances or trampling civil liberties. With congressional Republicans complicit in that power grab, the courts have emerged as the Constitution’s most effective defense — at least for now.

More in Politics

What happened the last time the US went all-in on tariffs?What happened the last time the US went all-in on tariffs?
Politics

Plus 6 other questions about Trump’s tariffs, answered.

By Nicole Narea
Trump’s tariffs are a mess. But are tariffs always bad?Trump’s tariffs are a mess. But are tariffs always bad?
Policy

Don’t judge tariffs on how Trump is using them.

By Abdallah Fayyad
The Supreme Court just made it easier for Trump to deport peopleThe Supreme Court just made it easier for Trump to deport people
Supreme Court

Despite the fact there isn’t a plausible argument the Alien Enemies Act can be used to do so.

By Ian Millhiser
Trump’s tariff-driven market crash, briefly explainedTrump’s tariff-driven market crash, briefly explained
The Logoff

The Dow has lost more than 4,000 points since the president rolled out his tariffs.

By Patrick Reis
The influential paper that explains Trump’s radical tariff policyThe influential paper that explains Trump’s radical tariff policy
Future Perfect

Tariffs aren’t helping globalization’s losers — they’re victimizing them again.

By Dylan Matthews
America may be headed for this rare type of economic crisisAmerica may be headed for this rare type of economic crisis
Politics

Stagflation, explained.

By Eric Levitz