Skip to main content

Make sense of it all

Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters. We don’t drown you in panic-inducing headlines, and we’re not obsessed with being the first to break the news. We’re focused on being helpful to you.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

A journalist reported Fox News’s Eric Bolling sent unsolicited dick pics. Now he’s facing a $50 million lawsuit.

Eric Bolling, the suspended co-host of The Fox News Specialists, says he is suing the reporter whose story about “lewd text messages” led to Bolling’s suspension.

Bolling is suing Yashar Ali, a contributing writer for HuffPost (formerly the Huffington Post) who broke the story of Bolling sending unsolicited lewd text messages to at least three different female colleagues at Fox Business and Fox News.

Ali tweeted on Wednesday afternoon that he had received a summons in a defamation lawsuit seeking $50 million in damages.

Lydia Polgreen, editor in chief of the Huffington Post, tweeted out Ali’s story after news broke of the lawsuit, emphasizing that the story had 14 sources, something other journalists had also noted on twitter.

Ali’s article, based on anonymous sources inside and outside Fox News and Fox Business, said that Bolling had several years ago sent messages with photos of male genitalia to at least three of his colleagues who had not solicited such messages.

Bolling’s attorney, Michael J. Bowe, commented in the article that, “Mr. Bolling recalls no such inappropriate communications, does not believe he sent any such communications, and will vigorously pursue his legal remedies for any false and defamatory accusations that are made.”

As Vox’s Zeeshan Aleem wrote about the story, “The language isn’t an outright denial, but a description of what Bowe claims he can remember; it appears to leave open the possibility that he could admit to sending the messages.”

Bolling’s comments are not dissimilar to President Donald Trump’s unfulfilled threats to sue the New York Times for defamation after a series of stories about allegations of sexual assault against the then-candidate, whose lawyers said at the time, they would be left “no option but to pursue all available actions and remedies.”

After Trump’s threats, Vox’s Tara Golshan discussed libel with several media law experts who pointed out that Trump would’ve had a difficult time proving libel as a public figure, something Bolling, a media personality, presumably will face in his lawsuit as well:

It’s a lot harder for a public figure to claim defamation, because not only would Trump have to prove these allegations are false, but he would also have to prove that they were done with “actual malice,” meaning that the New York Times published the article knowing it was false, or with reckless disregard for the truth

Interestingly, in this case, Bolling is seeking damages from Ali specifically and not HuffPost. CNN’s Nathan McDermott pointed out that this is odd given that, “theoretically” the company could afford to pay Bolling if he won the suit.

Ali doesn’t appear too concerned about the suit, tweeting that people shouldn’t donate to him but to the Committee to Protect Journalists.

On Thursday, he tweeted a story from Law Newz that characterized the suit as “total PR stunt.”

More in Politics

How Wisconsin explains AmericaHow Wisconsin explains America
Politics

The two electorates that are swinging American politics.

By Christian Paz
Trump’s massive tariffs, briefly explainedTrump’s massive tariffs, briefly explained
The Logoff

What Trump just announced — and what it means for you.

By Patrick Reis
5 big questions about Trump’s tariffs and how they might work5 big questions about Trump’s tariffs and how they might work
Politics

Here’s what “Liberation Day” means for you.

By Eric Levitz
The Supreme Court struggles with whether to wound Medicaid to spite Planned ParenthoodThe Supreme Court struggles with whether to wound Medicaid to spite Planned Parenthood
Supreme Court

The case should have a clear outcome, but a Republican Court overcomplicates everything that involves abortion.

By Ian Millhiser
Trump’s harshest agenda item is also his most popularTrump’s harshest agenda item is also his most popular
Immigration

Despite negative marks on the economy, Trump’s immigration policies are keeping him afloat.

By Christian Paz
Trump rolls out sweeping tariffs. Here’s what to know.Trump rolls out sweeping tariffs. Here’s what to know.
LIVE

Trump has vowed to impose “reciprocal tariffs” on all nations that he claims disadvantage American products through trade, tax, or regulatory policy.

By Vox Staff