Skip to main content

What really matters

In a world with too much noise and too little context, Vox helps you make sense of the news. We don’t flood you with panic-inducing headlines or race to be first. We focus on being useful to you — breaking down the news in ways that inform, not overwhelm.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

The controversy over Disney’s new Christian character, briefly explained

Pixar’s Win or Lose and Disney’s shifting stance on diversity.

WOL_Char_Teaser_Laurie_1s_v6.4_Mech5_FS
WOL_Char_Teaser_Laurie_1s_v6.4_Mech5_FS
The character Laurie from Win or Lose.
Pixar
Aja Romano
Aja Romano writes about pop culture, media, and ethics. Before joining Vox in 2016, they were a staff reporter at the Daily Dot. A 2019 fellow of the National Critics Institute, they’re considered an authority on fandom, the internet, and the culture wars.

Disney has added an explicitly Christian character to Pixar’s new series Win or Lose. That might not be head-turning in isolation, but it comes just months after nixing a transgender character’s storyline from the same show, and amid a cultural wave of pushbacks to diversification, both for Disney and the country at large. Now fans online are speculating about exactly what this latest move might mean. Is Disney entering a new conservative era, or is this just all business as usual? Let’s take a look.

Pixar’s series, which debuted on Disney+ at the end of February, follows a team of preteen softball players, with each episode focusing on a different character. Reports about what actually happened to Win or Lose’s trans character seem to be in conflict. In December, the Hollywood Reporter reported that Disney characterized the changes as simply removing “a few lines of dialogue that referenced gender identity” from one character’s storyline. But as Deadline reported, Pixar had explicitly sought a trans voice actress to play the role, and she later described herself as “very disheartened” by the change.

Some media reports have been oversimplistically juxtaposing the two decisions, either lamenting or celebrating the Christian character as a repudiation of the trans one, when of course, there can be overlap between religion and gender identity, and the Christianity portrayed in the show doesn’t take a position on the issue.

Yet in a larger context, there are some grounds for questioning the company’s motives. Disney has spent decades battling pushback from conservatives over its LGBTQ inclusivity, most recently over its hostile response to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law. The feud resulted in backlash on all sides, both for Florida and for then-Disney CEO Bob Chapek, who was subsequently given the boot in favor of his predecessor, Bob Iger.

Iger’s second tenure over the company has been markedly less progressive. In November 2024, the Disney channel pulled an episode of the Marvelverse show Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur that featured a trans character. And this week, Disney+ canceled Tiana, a series sequel to animated film The Princess and the Frog, even though it had been underway since 2020. The film featured Disney’s first Black princess (Anika Noni Rose, who was reprising her role) — but the Mouse said this decision was about moving away from long-form streaming content rather than pulling back from shows with diverse casts. (For other recent diverse examples across the Disney empire, see Moana 2 and Agatha All Along.)

That hasn’t stopped audiences across the political spectrum from making connections to what they see as a bigger change afoot. One frustrated fan described the cancellation of Tiana as “pure antiblackness.” “Openly gay out. Openly Christian in,” was how another X user framed Win or Lose; yet another cheered the removal of the trans character and the portrayal of the Christian character as “what winning looks like!”

In its current incarnation, however, Win or Lose isn’t easily a “win” for regressive politics. The show is not exactly pushing any barriers, but it’s far from proselytizing. The first episode shows a kid, Laurie, praying out loud to “Heavenly Father” as she waits for her turn to bat — but then she goes home and greets her tarot-reading, crystal-wearing mom. Meanwhile, there has been conservative upset online about another character: a Black mother who twerks.

What these character decisions add up to for the company’s future is unclear. Ultimately, this doesn’t seem like a situation where anyone has to win or lose.

More in Culture

No one’s happy about people filming themselves in gymsNo one’s happy about people filming themselves in gyms
Culture

The annoying new habit popping up in gyms across the country.

By Alex Abad-Santos
The strange link between Trump’s tariffs and incel ideologyThe strange link between Trump’s tariffs and incel ideology
Culture

Meet the lonely men who think the tariffs will get them girlfriends.

By Constance Grady
Giggly Squad and the extremely parasocial world of “podcast girlies”Giggly Squad and the extremely parasocial world of “podcast girlies”
Podcast
Culture

This podcast wants to be your new best friend.

By Kyndall Cunningham
How Joe Rogan’s America processed Trump’s tariffsHow Joe Rogan’s America processed Trump’s tariffs
Trump Administration

Trump’s podcasting and new media allies in the “manosphere” don’t know what to make of his tariff policy.

By Christian Paz
The unlikely origins of a (literal) blockbuster at the box officeThe unlikely origins of a (literal) blockbuster at the box office
Culture

How Gen Z fans turned a video game into movie theater mayhem.

By Aja Romano
How an influencer’s weight loss triggered an internet meltdownHow an influencer’s weight loss triggered an internet meltdown
Culture

Remi Bader proves it’s never been more complicated to publicly lose weight.

By Kyndall Cunningham