More from Travel ban: Supreme Court upholds Trump’s executive order on immigration and refugees

The doors are about to shut on refugees — but nobody knows how tightly.

The travel ban is coming back on Thursday — sort of. Here’s what you need to know.

If America doesn’t take in Syrians, who will? The ethics of the “Muslim ban,” explained.

The Supreme Court lifts a block on the executive order, banning many tourists from 6 majority-Muslim countries — and some refugees — from entering the US over the summer.

On World Refugee Day, looking at a 65 million person crisis.

And then there are the people who think “banning Muslims” and “protecting America” are two sides of the same coin.

The fate of Trump’s travel ban could be known in days — or delayed for months.

It’s not really about “political correctness,” but about the fundamentals of the American judicial system.

But he has no one but himself to blame.

In an unusual and aggressive move, the administration wants to skip a few steps in the court process.

The temporary hold has been turned into an indefinite hold.

Many exemptions to the ban were granted — but not for Syrians.

Even judges who think the travel ban is constitutional are horrified by Trump.

Shockingly, Trump is displeased.

Compared to February 2016, asylum seekers illegally crossing from the US to Canada have tripled.

It’s so narrowly tailored, in fact, that it raises the question of why the White House needed to issue it at all…

How much is your community served by doctors trained in one of the banned countries?

The new executive order avoids chaos within the US — but it’s still bad news for refugees abroad

Khaled Almilaji was tortured by Assad. Now, he’s been banned from America.

For evangelicals like Jenny Yang, a pro-life ethic means fighting for refugees.

It won’t totally judgeproof it. And probably couldn’t.

It doesn’t need the National Guard. It just needs to follow what Trump has already signed.