Skip to main content

Clarity in this chaotic news cycle

The news moves fast, but understanding takes time. At Vox, we don’t chase every headline. We focus on what really matters. We break down the biggest stories — and the ones others overlook — so you can make sense of the world, not just react to it.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

The Obama administration just took another step to protect trans people — in health care

Just hours after sending out clear guidelines against anti-transgender discrimination in schools, the Obama administration published another rule protecting trans people — this time in health care.

The US Department of Health and Human Services finalized the regulations for Section 1557 of Obamacare, which bans sex discrimination in health services and insurance. HHS says that bans on sex discrimination protect trans people, because discrimination based on gender identity is, fundamentally, discrimination over what people of certain sexes should be like. So it included trans people in its Section 1557 protections:

A covered entity shall provide individuals equal access to its health programs or activities without discrimination on the basis of sex; and a covered entity shall treat individuals consistent with their gender identity, except that a covered entity may not deny or limit health services that are ordinarily or exclusively available to individuals of one sex, to a transgender individual based on the fact that the individual’s sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender otherwise recorded is different from the one to which such health services are ordinarily or exclusively available.

As Zack Ford reported for ThinkProgress, the rule also prevents insurers from excluding procedures related to transitioning:

A covered entity shall not, in providing or administering health-related insurance or other health-related coverage… Have or implement a categorical coverage exclusion or limitation for all health services related to gender transition; or otherwise deny or limit coverage, deny or limit coverage of a claim, or impose additional cost sharing or other limitations or restrictions on coverage, for specific health services related to gender transition if such denial, limitation, or restriction results in discrimination against a transgender individual.

The rule does not, however, explicitly ban discrimination based on sexual orientation. But HHS said it encourages gay, lesbian, or bisexual patients to report any discrimination they face, and the feds “will evaluate complaints that allege sex discrimination related to an individual’s sexual orientation to determine if they involve the sorts of stereotyping that can be addressed under 1557.”

Trans people face a lot of discrimination in health care

The LGBTQ flag, with the transgender flag in the background.
Samuel Kubani/AFP via Getty Images

Although the lack of protections for sexual orientation disappointed LGBTQ advocates, they were quick to praise the provisions for trans people. There’s good reason for that: Trans people face a lot of discrimination in medical settings.

In a 2010 national survey published by various LGBTQ groups, 19 percent of trans and gender nonconforming people said they were refused care because of their gender identity or expression, 28 percent said they were subjected to harassment in medical settings, and 2 percent said they were victims of violence in such settings. This led to delays in care for many people: 28 percent said they postponed medical care when they were sick or injured due to discrimination.

Previously, a patchwork of state laws had protected trans patients in a few states. But with this newly finalized rule, trans people will be protected in all 50 states.

See More:

More in Politics

The assault on pro-Palestinian speech has a long and shameful historyThe assault on pro-Palestinian speech has a long and shameful history
Policy

Detentions of pro-Palestinian students are part of a broader assault on the First Amendment.

By Abdallah Fayyad
Trump is on a losing streak in the courts. How will he respond?Trump is on a losing streak in the courts. How will he respond?
Podcast
Today, Explained podcast

The administration’s war on the judiciary, explained by a law professor.

By Sean Rameswaram and Devan Schwartz
How worried should legal immigrants be about Trump’s deportations?How worried should legal immigrants be about Trump’s deportations?
Policy

Here’s what immigration lawyers say.

By Nicole Narea
The implicit threat in Trump’s push to change election rulesThe implicit threat in Trump’s push to change election rules
Politics

The president just set the stage to challenge election results he doesn’t like.

By Andrew Prokop
The Supreme Court hands a rare loss to gun companiesThe Supreme Court hands a rare loss to gun companies
Supreme Court

Justice Neil Gorsuch’s “ghost guns” opinion is extremely narrow, but it is correct.

By Ian Millhiser
Kavanaugh and Barrett appear likely to break with the Supreme Court’s MAGA wingKavanaugh and Barrett appear likely to break with the Supreme Court’s MAGA wing
Supreme Court

At least for now…

By Ian Millhiser