Skip to main content

Make sense of it all

Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters. We don’t drown you in panic-inducing headlines, and we’re not obsessed with being the first to break the news. We’re focused on being helpful to you.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

What the conservative caricature of “safe spaces” gets wrong

Do safe spaces stifle free thought on college campuses? That’s the wrong question.

There’s a big issue with the current discussion about college campuses and safe spaces: A lot of people are getting the definition of safe spaces wrong.

Many conservative critics portray safe spaces as places that engulf entire university campuses and bar any controversial or challenging ideas. The big fear is a largely liberal student body will block any conservative speakers from campus, because they’ll see those speakers as presenting controversial ideas that a majority of students don’t support or want to hear.

The problem: This is a caricature.

So what are safe spaces? On Twitter, Kevin Gannon, a history professor at Grand View University in Iowa, offered a great explanation. (He previously wrote about the topic for Vox.)

The short of it: Allowing safe spaces doesn’t mean that whole campuses are cordoned off as places devoid of any controversial or challenging ideas. Safe spaces are, instead, a specific place where people of certain groups — racial, religious, and so on — can go temporarily to talk to and hang out with peers in a similar place without having to do the kind of cultural translation that a more diverse crowd might require.

Here’s Gannon’s full tweetstorm:


This really isn’t that complicated. Take gay bars as one example: If I, as a gay man, want to meet other guys and talk to other guys about guys without the fear of bigotry, it would be nonsensical to go to a straight bar. A gay bar is obviously a better, safer place for that.

Going to that gay bar, however, has nothing to do with whether I will, back in political science, constitutional law, or sociology class, hear and take part in a debate about whether same-sex marriage should be legal or if same-sex parents are just as capable as opposite-sex parents. My presence in a safe space like a gay bar is temporary, and it doesn’t set my expectations for general public discourse outside that safe space.

The same would apply to a campus LGBTQ organization, gay-straight alliance, or even the gay social network app Grindr. I might participate in these spaces sometimes, but that won’t define everything else I’m doing.

For more on safe spaces, read Emily Crockett’s explainer.

See More:

More in Politics

What Trump’s tariff pause can’t solveWhat Trump’s tariff pause can’t solve
Politics

Nobody knows what Trump will do next — and that’s a problem.

By Nicole Narea
Trump’s tariffs are Democrats’ golden opportunity. Are they botching it?Trump’s tariffs are Democrats’ golden opportunity. Are they botching it?
Politics

The party shouldn’t echo Trump’s myths about trade.

By Eric Levitz
Why can Trump just say everything is an “emergency” and do whatever he wants?Why can Trump just say everything is an “emergency” and do whatever he wants?
Policy

Trump’s power to declare a national emergency is a national emergency.

By Abdallah Fayyad
What just happened with Trump’s tariffs?What just happened with Trump’s tariffs?
The Logoff

He paused some tariffs — and then escalated a trade war with China.

By Patrick Reis
Trump’s tariff war isn’t overTrump’s tariff war isn’t over
Politics

There’s a questionable assumption fueling the stock market rally.

By Eric Levitz
Why Trump blinkedWhy Trump blinked
Politics

His advisers claimed it was all part of the plan. Trump said otherwise.

By Andrew Prokop